About Author

Stephen Schleicher began his career writing for the Digital Media Online community of sites, including Digital Producer and Creative Mac covering all aspects of the digital content creation industry. He then moved on to consumer technology, and began the Coolness Roundup podcast. A writing fool, Stephen has freelanced for Sci-Fi Channel's Technology Blog, and Gizmodo. Still longing for the good ol' days, Stephen launched Major Spoilers in July 2006, because he is a glutton for punishment. You can follow him on Twitter @MajorSpoilers and tell him your darkest secrets...


  1. The Ninja Charro on

    Goddamn! The hul loks great, but the Abomination lokks like what we call in México “dos, tres” (two, three) good, but not perfect.

  2. The actors and the acting looked good (except Sam Elliott was perfect as “Thunderbolt” Ross.) The concept seems strong. I don’t know if I like the CGI Hulk as well as the Abomination.

    While over at MTV, check out the Iron Man trailer. I am more excited to see this film. The problems with computer generated superheroes is much less obvious when dealing with a metal suit of armor.

  3. I dunno why, but I keep getting a weird Fist of the North Star/big green Bruce Lee vibe from this lo-carb diet hulk…lol

  4. I would love it if we could get a talking Hulk….”Hulk Smash” or “Hulk is the strongest one there is!” would totally rock….

  5. Am I the only one who thinks this looks like a cheap 90’s flick? I’m one of the few who actually liked the first Hulk with Eric Bana. This one just looks too cheezy to me.

  6. Oh… also… Abomination doesn’t look like the abomination that I’m used too. He should be more scaley and reptilian looking in my mind.

  7. The first movie was good. It was very cerebral, and a psychological examination of the Hulk. Of course, the Hulk is more suited to “smash em up adaptations”.

Leave A Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.