Stephen Schleicher began his career writing for the Digital Media Online community of sites, including Digital Producer and Creative Mac covering all aspects of the digital content creation industry. He then moved on to consumer technology, and began the Coolness Roundup podcast. A writing fool, Stephen has freelanced for Sci-Fi Channel's Technology Blog, and Gizmodo. Still longing for the good ol' days, Stephen launched Major Spoilers in July 2006, because he is a glutton for punishment.
You can follow him on Twitter @MajorSpoilers and tell him your darkest secrets...
These make my brain hurt. Susan Richards, whose recently put up forcefields that stopped a fight involving two Hulks, the Captain (both Americas, Britain, and Marvel), Luke Cage, She Hulk, Spiderman, Spectrum, Sunspot, and Blue Marvel, is somehow listed as having a 2 for Badass factor and fighting skills, and a 1 in strength. REALLY?
Storm, who can alter weather patterns on a global scale, and Scarlet Witch who wiped out the mutant race in one sentence, are both listed as less powerful and badass than Elektra and Black Widow? Ugh.
This doesn’t seem very accurate to me. It looks more like an office voted popularity contest than it does something with actual research behind it. Nice concept, but I’m just unable to agree with the results.
4 Comments
These make my brain hurt. Susan Richards, whose recently put up forcefields that stopped a fight involving two Hulks, the Captain (both Americas, Britain, and Marvel), Luke Cage, She Hulk, Spiderman, Spectrum, Sunspot, and Blue Marvel, is somehow listed as having a 2 for Badass factor and fighting skills, and a 1 in strength. REALLY?
Storm, who can alter weather patterns on a global scale, and Scarlet Witch who wiped out the mutant race in one sentence, are both listed as less powerful and badass than Elektra and Black Widow? Ugh.
I agree a fun exercise but fundamentally flawed.
Not to mention that Black Widow and Elektra are listed as having the same strength as the super strong Captain Marvel
This doesn’t seem very accurate to me. It looks more like an office voted popularity contest than it does something with actual research behind it. Nice concept, but I’m just unable to agree with the results.