Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    What You Think it Means QOTD
    Question Of The Day

    Major Spoilers Question of the Day: Doesn’t Mean What You Think It Means Edition

    Matthew PetersonBy Matthew PetersonDecember 1, 20212 Comments1 Min Read

    I realize that speech and language are complex matters full of subjectivity, so I try not to spend too much effort on policing the word usage of others.  That said, I really dislike the current online vernacular usage of “insane” as a universal adjective/intensifier.  It feels trite, meaningless and worst of all, overused, leaving me less interested in whatever is being described, which is the death knell for click bait.  There are a number of words that I overuse, I am aware, but the ubiquity of “insane” both puzzles and infuriates me, leading to today’s baffling query…

    The MS-QOTD (pronounced, as always, “misquoted”) has one weird trick for faster browsing, asking: Which single word that no longer means what you think it means would you most like stricken from the language?

    Major Spoilers Question Of The Day
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticlePREVIEW: Sonjaversal #10
    Next Article Justice League Incarnate #1 Review
    Matthew Peterson
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Once upon a time, there was a young nerd from the Midwest, who loved Matter-Eater Lad and the McKenzie Brothers... If pop culture were a maze, Matthew would be the Minotaur at its center. Were it a mall, he'd be the Food Court. Were it a parking lot, he’d be the distant Cart Corral where the weird kids gather to smoke, but that’s not important right now... Matthew enjoys body surfing (so long as the bodies are fresh), writing in the third person, and dark-eyed women. Amongst his weaponry are such diverse elements as: Fear! Surprise! Ruthless efficiency! An almost fanatical devotion to pop culture! And a nice red uniform.

    Related Posts

    Geek History Lesson – Zombies

    Read More

    Geek History Lesson – Flash Family MEGA EPISODE (Barry Alan, Iris West, Wally West, Bart Allen)

    Read More

    Geek History Lesson – Action Spies MEGA EPISODE (Mission Impossible, James Bond 007, Is James Bond Still Relevant)

    Read More

    2 Comments

    1. Daniel Langsdale on December 1, 2021 9:42 am

      ‘They/their/theirs’ used to represent a person in the singular. It’s worse than the royal ‘we.’ Am I old and out of touch? Maybe. Probably. But I prefer using words to communicate and clarify, and not in ways that introduce ambiguity. We get new words all the time for new or newly popularized concepts, and a new pronoun needs to be coined for non-cisgendered people in the singular, just as “cisgendered” itself was coined only within recent decades.

      Reply
      • Dan on December 1, 2021 10:34 am

        Yeah, there hasn’t been an established “new” gender-neutral pronoun yet, so until those who would be addressed as such come to a consensus as to what that is, “they/them/theirs” is the closest thing the english language has and i will continue to do my best to adhere to that for whoever needs it. It’s definitely janky, but again…it’s not like non-binary folks asked to exist in this weird cisgender patriarchal language system establish by old white men in powdered wigs 700 years ago. The less chances for folks to feel “undefinable” or unseen or further othered, the better life will be.

        Obvious racist/misogynist/lgbtq-phobic words aside, i personally would like to see the hyperbolic context of words like “epic” and “iconic” get stricken from the record. The words themselves are fine, but this new tumblr/twitter recontextualization of “epic” means kinda rubs me the wrong way. But then again i grew up in an era where “awesome” and “radical” were acceptable terms for “something that’s pretty good,” so i guess i just have to shuffle my walker over to the slow lane and let relevant society mangle their own words to express how good last night’s episode of Pretty Little Liars was

        Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    7.0
    June 24, 2025

    West Coast Avengers #8 Review

    6.7
    June 23, 2025

    The Avengers #27 Review

    7.3
    June 22, 2025

    Krypto: The Last Dog of Krypton #1 Review

    6.7
    June 22, 2025

    Retro Review: Menace #11 (May 1954)

    8.0
    June 20, 2025

    Jeff the Land Shark #1 Review

    Patreon Support
    Major Spoilers Store
    Recent Comments
    • Bunty Original on Warner Bros. plans Mortal Kombat Legends: Scorpion’s Revenge virtual viewing party and panel
    • Derrigable on COMICS PORTAL: Where Is All The Cool Merchandise?
    • ZackaryTobias on COMICS PORTAL: Where Is All The Cool Merchandise?
    • Nathan on Wayne’s Comics Podcast #696: Interview with Creators from Concrete Arcanum
    • Austin Cowboy on FIRST LOOK: Conan the Barbarian #21
    Subscribe to the Major Spoilers E-Mail List
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT