Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    Major Spoilers

    Major Spoilers Question Of The Day: “Thank You For Calling Baker Baker Davison McGann And McCoy, How May I Help You?” Edition

    Matthew PetersonBy Matthew PetersonApril 3, 201319 Comments2 Mins Read

    After months of groundless and histrionic speculation, BBC has officially confirmed that David Tennant will be returning as The Tenth Doctor in the Doctor Who 50th Anniversary Special to be aired this fall.  They’ve even tweeting pictures of Tennant and Matt Smith at a read-through, though that might be a ruse.  Devilishly clever, those BBC producers.  Though crossovers between Doctors are commonplace in “expanded universe” Doctor Who media (There’s a lovely novel called “The Eight Doctors” that not only tries to fix continuity gaffes for the American TV movie, but for ALL the incarnations of the Doctor to date, and still manages to make a story out of it), actual televised meetings of the actors in character are as rare as hen’s teeth, with the expected Ten/Eleven team-up marking only the fifth such instance in the five-decade history of the show.  Indeed, those previous occasions were each marked by real-world difficulty: William Hartnell’s infirmity kept his Doctor out of the action in ‘The Three Doctors,’ while Tom Baker declined to return in ‘The Five Doctors,’ and sometimes I feel like I’m the only one who saw the Sixth and Second Doctors working together in Spain…

    Still, the current production team may be the most “meta” in history, and I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find Tennant and Smith interacting with their previous selves somehow or other, maybe even a ‘Back To The Future II’ scenario where they have to get Lea Thompson to fall out of love with them travel their own past timelines, allowing for tribute to the previous nine Docs.

    The MS-QOTD (pronounced, as always, “misquoted”) is still foolishly clinging to the hope of appearances by Four, Five, Six, Seven and Eight, simply because it would be ridiculously awesome, asking:  Will you be disappointed if the 50th Anniversary features only TWO Doctors in action?

    Doctor Who Major Spoilers Question Of The Day
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleTELEVISION: Teen Titans Go! are on a poster
    Next Article SOLICITATIONS: IDW Publishing announces creative team for Thunder Agents
    Matthew Peterson
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Once upon a time, there was a young nerd from the Midwest, who loved Matter-Eater Lad and the McKenzie Brothers... If pop culture were a maze, Matthew would be the Minotaur at its center. Were it a mall, he'd be the Food Court. Were it a parking lot, he’d be the distant Cart Corral where the weird kids gather to smoke, but that’s not important right now... Matthew enjoys body surfing (so long as the bodies are fresh), writing in the third person, and dark-eyed women. Amongst his weaponry are such diverse elements as: Fear! Surprise! Ruthless efficiency! An almost fanatical devotion to pop culture! And a nice red uniform.

    Related Posts

    Critical Hit #789: Monster Wrangler – Session Zero (MWS01-E00)

    Read More

    Top Five Snacks (2025 Edition)

    Read More

    Major Spoilers Podcast #1130: Good Ol’ Major Spoilers

    Read More

    19 Comments

    1. Praion on April 3, 2013 11:30 am

      No i won’t. I trust in Moffat when he said that the special will be about looking forward and ahead, not about just celebrating what came before.

      Reply
    2. Dave on April 3, 2013 11:42 am

      I will not be disappointed if the others do not show up in one form or another. However, I will be fanboyishly excited if they do find a way to make an appearance that works in-story.

      Reply
    3. SpiderLover on April 3, 2013 12:38 pm

      David tenant? I guess that means ill watch some more doctor who. I’d like to see Eckelsen as well but Tennant is enough.

      Reply
    4. Paderic Waggoner on April 3, 2013 12:40 pm

      After a bit of thinking, I have to say that I will not be disappointed. Having Tennant back is awesome enough. Though, having the other doctors back as well would be icing on the cake. Delicious, delicious cake.

      Reply
    5. Alisha Mynx on April 3, 2013 1:47 pm

      Will I be disappointed? Depends on if they at least touch upon the past in some other fashion or not. It is the 50th Anniversary of the entire series after all, not just of the revived series. If it is simply Tennant and Smith, then I’d love to see some other elements of the old series so that it feels like the special is honoring the whole series.

      Reply
    6. TaZ on April 3, 2013 2:31 pm

      Oh, yes. This is the 50th of one of the most watched SCIFI franchises in history and only two “Doctor/Doctor Emeritus” would have to work hard and use “flashbacks” to pay any decent homage to the other actors, “companions”, etc. Of course, I’ll watch with only two and probably enjoy it immensely but it would be like if the first Star Trek Movie had only had Kirk and Spock and not the rest of the cast.

      Reply
      • Robert Hulshof-Schmidt on April 3, 2013 2:38 pm

        What he said. Twice.

        Reply
    7. Bruce on April 3, 2013 3:04 pm

      All signs seem to be pointing to revelations about the question ‘Doctor Who?’ so I think the likelihood of some combination of past Doctors is high. Which ones, how many and in what capacity they appear in-story is what I’m looking forward to. Should be fun.

      Reply
    8. comicfan1974 on April 3, 2013 4:37 pm

      I won’t be any more disappointed than I have been by most of the new series, and I don’t think they ever seriously considered asking the original series leads back, since most people who watch the new series only know 9, 10 and 11. The funny thing is imagining Moffat asking Eccleston and being told to take a walk.

      Reply
    9. AllenBT on April 3, 2013 5:05 pm

      The nostalgia hound in me says yes, I would be disappointed, but the realist in me says I’d rather have a good story and good acting.

      The surviving emeritus Doctors from the prior series are all pretty long in the tooth. Trotting them out just to show the flag seems to me to be a bit of a disservice to their careers. And using clips as flash backs, etc. well that never really works out.

      Sometimes you just can’t go home again and should leave fond memories and history as just that.

      Reply
    10. tidge on April 3, 2013 6:25 pm

      Don’t forget the wonderful “Ten Doctors” web comic:

      http://comics.shipsinker.com/?id=18

      Reply
    11. Nonprophet on April 3, 2013 7:20 pm

      I’ll be a bit disappointed if this is the human Doctor that was left with Rose in the other universe, even if it is what I am expecting it to be. Now by disappointed I mean I’d love it a little less then I could, but almost assuredly I will still love it.

      Reply
    12. zookningel on April 3, 2013 8:59 pm

      I’d like to see Jenny, the Doctor’s Daughter.

      Reply
      • Alisha Mynx on April 3, 2013 10:28 pm

        Seconded. There is so much potential with that character.

        Reply
        • Firefox on April 3, 2013 11:20 pm

          I am still surprised they left her like that.

          Reply
    13. Scott on April 4, 2013 11:51 am

      They could do the same timey-wimey thing they did with the Five and Ten meet-up a few years ago to explain why Four, Five, Six, and Seven are older, and, aside from the suggestion that the Doctor had recently regenerated into Nine in “Rose,” no one knows how long Eight was around, so he could have just aged naturally. I’d be more curious how they’d explain the absence of One, Two, and Three.

      Nine might also be a problem, because Eccleston, for reasons that I fail to comprehend, seems to have issues with having played the Doctor (if he was that worried about typecasting, why did he take the role in the first place?)

      Reply
    14. Scott on April 4, 2013 11:52 am

      Given the villain that’s supposed to be in the 50th anniversary special, I’m wondering what, exactly, Ten and Rose are going to be doing.

      Reply
    15. Christina on April 4, 2013 12:12 pm

      Possibly, but I would love at the very least some mention of the older Doctors. Honestly, the number of Doctors I want in the 50th depends on how the story will work out (but it would be awesome if all the still living Doctors and former companions could get on the show!)

      Reply
      • AllenBT on April 4, 2013 6:57 pm

        So all of the former Doctors “died” and therefore shouldn’t have aged past their swan song scenes right? This is a problem for continuity and always made prior reunions a little wonky.

        Companions are a different story. They go on with their lives, after leaving the Tardis.

        Perhaps a better solution is to have the younger actors who don’t look to have aged, reprise their Doctors, and have the older Doctors represented by their companions in a little pairing mash-up.

        Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    8.3
    June 17, 2025

    Giant-Size Dark Phoenix Saga #1 Review

    7.7
    June 17, 2025

    Supergirl #2 Review

    6.0
    June 16, 2025

    Runaways #1 Review

    8.0
    June 15, 2025

    The Death of the Silver Surfer #1 Review

    4.7
    June 15, 2025

    Retro Review: Master Comics #11 (February 1941)

    Patreon Support
    Major Spoilers Store
    Recent Comments
    • Derrigable on COMICS PORTAL: Where Is All The Cool Merchandise?
    • ZackaryTobias on COMICS PORTAL: Where Is All The Cool Merchandise?
    • Nathan on Wayne’s Comics Podcast #696: Interview with Creators from Concrete Arcanum
    • Austin Cowboy on FIRST LOOK: Conan the Barbarian #21
    • Frank on COMICS PORTAL: Batman Meets… Deadpool!?
    Subscribe to the Major Spoilers E-Mail List
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT