Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    Major Spoilers

    Major Spoilers Question Of The Day: Desperate Late-Night Vamping Edition

    Matthew PetersonBy Matthew PetersonOctober 3, 2012Updated:October 4, 201210 Comments1 Min Read

    After last night’s recording of the Major Spoilers Podcast, Major Spoilers Intern/Cub Reporter Young Zach and I were trying to come up with a decent QOTD for today.  Sadly, the lad isn’t quite ready for the pressure of this particular feature and totally choked.  We’ll give him another shot later.  Maybe…  Stephen, thankfully, stepped in and saved us all (Sometimes it’s good to have a friend who always has an axe to grind with the foolishness of the comic industry) and based on September’s big ratings stunts, raises a very important and timely question.

    The MS-QOTD (pronounced, as always, “misquoted”) can’t find a decent copy of Amazing Spider-Man #Σ, asking:  Do you see the point in unusual numbering schemes (like the .1, #1/2 or zero issue phenomena) or do you think it’s just another attempt to mess up the order of my back issue bins?

    Major Spoilers Question Of The Day
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleMOVIE REVIEW: Resident Evil Retribution
    Next Article IDW Publishing launches IDW Limited
    Matthew Peterson
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Once upon a time, there was a young nerd from the Midwest, who loved Matter-Eater Lad and the McKenzie Brothers... If pop culture were a maze, Matthew would be the Minotaur at its center. Were it a mall, he'd be the Food Court. Were it a parking lot, he’d be the distant Cart Corral where the weird kids gather to smoke, but that’s not important right now... Matthew enjoys body surfing (so long as the bodies are fresh), writing in the third person, and dark-eyed women. Amongst his weaponry are such diverse elements as: Fear! Surprise! Ruthless efficiency! An almost fanatical devotion to pop culture! And a nice red uniform.

    Related Posts

    Coming Next Week: The Dunwich Horror by H.P. Lovecraft

    Read More

    Critical Hit #663: Shadow of the Demon Lord: Lord Death Man (SotDL10)

    Read More

    Legion Clubhouse #126: The Great Darkness Saga Concludes

    Read More

    10 Comments

    1. Rome on October 3, 2012 12:14 pm

      I think all of the numbering schemes- Particularly restarts with new #1’s when the title continues exactly as before (ala Captain America, New Avengers, etc.) is completely ridiculous.

      I don’t mind the DC wide restart, because it really was a new beginning. The zero issues… I don’t know. Some seemed interesting. Most seemed forced.

      The .1 stuff at marvel is beyond inane. They are rarely actually good jumping on points, and just force another issue into the yearly schedule that indeed makes continuity and storage and later retrieval an unneeded hassle.

      Reply
    2. Robert Hulshof-Schmidt on October 3, 2012 12:47 pm

      Hokum and hype, almost without exception. A new #1 during a major reboot or after a long hiatus makes sense. Other than that, just move forward one issue at a time, please.

      Origin stories and jumping-on points can be highlighted without the artificial introduction of weird numbering (like they were for decades…) Zero Month was mostly a rude interruption with mediocre results rather than the helpful introductions that were promised.

      On the other hand, a crossover-wide numbering scheme for AvX that alllowed for sequential reading of all the bloody issues after the fact would have been really handy, wouldn’t it?

      Reply
    3. Bruce on October 3, 2012 12:59 pm

      Those in the industry often complain the difficulty of attracting new or lapsed readers. Multiple crossovers with adjacent miniseries and one-shots are bad enough, throw in a confusing, impenetrable numbering system and it’s no wonder why those theoretical new readers stay away in droves.

      If I can’t walk into a shop, find the Avengers bin, pick up issues 25-40 and find a reasonably continuous story or series of stories without doing extensive research on miscellaneous offshoots, then buying comics becomes a chore and not a fun hobby. It was exactly this type of garbage that helped me break my monthly comic habit.

      Reply
    4. Ryan 'Halite' King on October 3, 2012 1:07 pm

      I don’t like it.

      The point 1 stuff sounds good on paper, but more often than not it is an unwanted interruption to the reader who is on board and isn’t a good jumping on point to new readers.

      Re-numbering is frustrating to everybody. On-going readers may have to ask their retailer to keep pulling, or suddenly drop because they want to follow green Hulk as a character and their book is now suddenly different. New readers may have a hard time, I’ve asked for Avengers and Iron Man starting at #1 and found current runs in my pull box multiple times. I don’t blame my retailer for this mistake, they are probably just as confused.

      Crossovers or special months that interrupt a story really bother me. I think for DC, Batman/Swamp Thing/Animal Man have managed to pull of cross overs and interpreted stories well, but some titles (Birds of Prey) seem to be lost.

      Reply
    5. Rob on October 3, 2012 1:08 pm

      Nah, it really is just an elaborate conspiracy to drive guys who work in comic stores insane there by allowing them to be replaced with mindless drones who will only recommend books from the big two.

      Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

      Reply
    6. Art Guy Charlie on October 3, 2012 1:16 pm

      Most number gimmicks are just silly attempts to grab attention. They don’t necessarily bother me (so long as they’re used in moderation), but I’ve never bought into the hype they’re supposed to be producing.

      The only ones that makes much sense to me are the ‘x.1’ or ‘x.5’ issues; Since their stories are supposed to chronologically take place in between two existing issues.

      Reply
    7. falinor@gmail.com on October 3, 2012 1:44 pm

      Smoke and mirrors, mixed with a bit of pixie dust and a whole bunch of Sales BS.

      Reply
    8. Alisha Mynx on October 3, 2012 1:52 pm

      I don’t mind the odd numberings if the story has a point. If it is a good story that fills in a spot between normal number issues (such as the current #0 issues) or tells one story (the old Gen13 issues #13a, 13b, etc) or something like a promo issue that tells a story taking place between two issues (with a numbering like 3 1/2 or 3.5 set between issues 3 and 4) I’m usually on board. But if there isn’t anything substantial to set the issue apart other than the number, it drives me crazy.

      Reply
    9. B.V.K. on October 3, 2012 5:29 pm

      I don’t know if it has a point but is annoys the hell out of me.

      Reply
    10. zaranblack on October 4, 2012 2:06 pm

      Wouldn’t .1 issues just be updates to buggy comics put out before they were finished?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    6.7
    August 15, 2022

    Blood Syndicate: Season One #4 Review

    8.0
    August 15, 2022

    Power Rangers #22 Review

    9.0
    August 14, 2022

    Ghost Rider: Vengeance Forever #1 Review

    8.3
    August 14, 2022

    Retro Review: The Sandman #23 (February 1991)

    6.3
    August 13, 2022

    Predator #1 Review

    Patreon Support
    Major Spoilers Store
    Recent Comments
    • Valerie Meachum on C2E2: Cosplay – Day 2
    • Kevin Evans on BOOM! Studios announces trading cards in celebration of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers #100
    • Kevin Evans on Major Spoilers Classics #001: Absolute Sandman Volume 1
    • Jonathan Cadotte on So You Want To Read Comics: Journalism Edition
    • Robin on So You Want To Read Comics: Journalism Edition
    Subscribe to the Major Spoilers E-Mail List
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    ComiXology Home Page">
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2022 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.