Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    Major Spoilers

    Major Spoilers Question Of The Day: Solomon-HarryHoudini-AlBundy-Zatanna-AdamAnt-Morrisey Edition

    Matthew PetersonBy Matthew PetersonJuly 25, 2012Updated:June 14, 20139 Comments1 Min Read

    With the recent release of Marvel Comics’ new Captain Marvel title and the announcement that the original Cap will be going by Shazam, I’ve been thinking about superhero naming conventions.  In recent years, Marvel has been notorious for having multiple versions of the same character name floating around (right now, there’s a non-Peter-Parker version of Spider-Man in the Dark Avengers, there’s Miles Morales over in the Ultimate universe, and half a dozen alternate universal versions, such as 1601 Peter Parquagh), while DC’s multiple realities made discussions of WHICH Green Lantern had come out as gay akin to an Abbot & Costello routine.  (“Who’s on first?”  “Guy Gardner!”)

    The MS-QOTD (prounced “Zeh-hoo-tee”) always kind of had a crush on Isis, asking:
    Should iconic names be “retired” like jersey numbers, or is it fair play to have six active Captains Marvel?

    Captain Marvel Major Spoilers Question Of The Day
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleMajor Spoilers Hero Award: Christian Bale
    Next Article SOLICITATIONS: Image Comics announces Point of Impact
    Matthew Peterson
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Once upon a time, there was a young nerd from the Midwest, who loved Matter-Eater Lad and the McKenzie Brothers... If pop culture were a maze, Matthew would be the Minotaur at its center. Were it a mall, he'd be the Food Court. Were it a parking lot, he’d be the distant Cart Corral where the weird kids gather to smoke, but that’s not important right now... Matthew enjoys body surfing (so long as the bodies are fresh), writing in the third person, and dark-eyed women. Amongst his weaponry are such diverse elements as: Fear! Surprise! Ruthless efficiency! An almost fanatical devotion to pop culture! And a nice red uniform.

    Related Posts

    Major Spoilers Podcast #1131: The Podcast Smurfers

    Read More

    Critical Hit #789: Monster Wrangler – Session Zero (MWS01-E00)

    Read More

    Top Five Snacks (2025 Edition)

    Read More

    9 Comments

    1. TaZ on July 25, 2012 11:43 am

      I’ll repeat my opinion that I posted on the review of the Marvel “Captain Marvel” title. If it’s not related to saying or using the word “Shazam” it’s not Captain Marvel. I did not like the “Power of Shazam” series when Billy, Mary and Freddy all three were “Captain Marvel I, II and III” because it sounded more like a masked team of luchadors. Marvel should have left the Kree Mar-Vell alone and not used the appearance of the composite Mar-Vell during the Avengers romp on Hala with the Phoenix Force as a reason for Carol Danvers to finally take on the name after all these years as “Ms. Marvel”. Unless it’s a legacy hero (such as The Winter Solider’s turn as Captain America) then a character name should be retired. The “dark” thing has worn out as well. Bring back the Thunderbolts.

      Reply
      • George Chimples on July 25, 2012 11:51 am

        But what determines a legacy hero?

        Reply
    2. Kevin Flythe on July 25, 2012 12:23 pm

      Regarding DC and Marvel both having a character with the same name, doesn’t bother me one bit. But what about the question you really seem to be asking, multiple characters in the same shared universe having the same name? Well, in the case of Green Lantern, there’s an established corps, so it’s common knowledge that there are multiple “Green Lanterns” just as there are multiple soldiers in an army, so that’s fine. Marvel has been pretty annoying with that stuff lately, particularly with the hulk family. We’re honestly going to have an on-going title called “Red She-Hulk”? And at least she’s red. What about Lyra? She and Jennifer are both just “She-Hulk”. As for Hulk and Red Hulk, they were distinguished by the titles of their magazines. I don’t read either, though, so I don’t know if characters called the red hulk “Red Hulk,” “Hulk,” or “Rulk” in-universe. Bucky Cap being Captain America was fine, because there was only one Cap at the time, same as Dick being Batman, at least up until Bruce came back, then it just got weird.

      So, where do I stand? Unless the superhero name refers to membership in a group (like GL Corps), they should be retired, EXCEPT in cases where the name is not being used by the original (or current guy/gal) because they’re retired, dead, or otherwise incapacitated, and use of the name serves the story.

      Reply
    3. Art Guy Charlie on July 25, 2012 1:56 pm

      I’m perfectly fine with multiple heroes using the same name with the one caveat that there should only be ONE character CURRENTLY using each name per universe. Only the names of deceased or retired heroes should be up for grabs.

      Miles becoming the new Ultimate Spider-man after Peter’s passing is great, Ms. Marvel “graduating” into Captain Marvel is even better. But having two different characters with the same hero name active at the same time in the same universe becomes a complicated and confusing mess (not counting the occasional ‘old guy meets new guy’ story or other special events where it makes sense for there to be two of them for a short period of time).

      The one exception to this is Green Lantern. A big part of the GL mythos is that there are tons of GLs, so it never bothered me to have a handful on Earth.

      Reply
      • B.V.K. on July 25, 2012 5:13 pm

        Seconded

        Reply
      • Georgedubya on July 25, 2012 6:52 pm

        I think you and Kevin really summed up everything I have to say about the issue.

        Reply
    4. Oldcomicfan on July 25, 2012 2:03 pm

      My opinion is that if a hero is gone (and, leaving all gimmicks aside, the only reason for getting rid of a character should be lack of sales, in which case WHY would you want to bring the dud back again?) the name and character should be retired. I’ve been reading superhero comics off and on since the 1960s – before the days of multi-verses and Earth 2’s, and if somebody wanted to tell a story out of continuity, they just did an “imaginary tale” – which is pretty funny because they are all “imaginary tales”. There’s a reason most of the golden age heroes except for Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel (the original) are no longer around. They didn’t sell well enough to continue support a monthly book. So why would a comic company want to dilute their resources by bringing back old characters that didn’t sell in the first place?

      Reply
      • Matthew Peterson on July 25, 2012 2:41 pm

        the only reason for getting rid of a character should be lack of sales, in which case WHY would you want to bring the dud back again?

        One might point out that Uncanny X-Men was cancelled in 1970 due to lack of sales…

        Reply
    5. DudeX on July 25, 2012 7:32 pm

      Don’t forget, DC also had three Flashes running around, too. It doesn’t really matter to me as long as I’m able to distinguish between the different ones. Of course, using different synonyms wouldn’t hurt either.

      Side note: Remember when the CFL had two teams both named the Roughriders, weren’t the Wildcats available?

      Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    8.3
    June 17, 2025

    Giant-Size Dark Phoenix Saga #1 Review

    7.7
    June 17, 2025

    Supergirl #2 Review

    6.0
    June 16, 2025

    Runaways #1 Review

    8.0
    June 15, 2025

    The Death of the Silver Surfer #1 Review

    4.7
    June 15, 2025

    Retro Review: Master Comics #11 (February 1941)

    Patreon Support
    Major Spoilers Store
    Recent Comments
    • Derrigable on COMICS PORTAL: Where Is All The Cool Merchandise?
    • ZackaryTobias on COMICS PORTAL: Where Is All The Cool Merchandise?
    • Nathan on Wayne’s Comics Podcast #696: Interview with Creators from Concrete Arcanum
    • Austin Cowboy on FIRST LOOK: Conan the Barbarian #21
    • Frank on COMICS PORTAL: Batman Meets… Deadpool!?
    Subscribe to the Major Spoilers E-Mail List
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT