Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    Major Spoilers

    Major Spoilers Question Of The Day: Where We Shall Spend The Rest Of Our Lives Edition

    Matthew PetersonBy Matthew PetersonJune 27, 2012Updated:June 14, 201311 Comments1 Min Read

    While merging on the freeway yesterday, I began to think about the promises made to us by science fiction about the future, and how the d-bag in the Prius could have killed me much more efficiently in a Flying Car than he could with his mere two-dimensional crappy driving.  Sure, a flying car would be cool, but given that my Chrysler’s brakes are grinding and squeaking like the cell doors at Azkaban Prison, I’m certain my theoretical flying car would be equally ill-maintained and hazardous to life and limb, balancing any George Jetson thrills with the occasional plunge to Earth.

    The MS-QOTD (pronounced, as always, “misquoted”) wants to get it up to 88 and show you some serious $#!+, asking:  What other future technology would be utterly disastrous and awful in practice?

    Major Spoilers Question Of The Day
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleMOVIE: Lego Super Heroes find voices
    Next Article MOVIE: A new set pic from Man of Steel hits
    Matthew Peterson
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Once upon a time, there was a young nerd from the Midwest, who loved Matter-Eater Lad and the McKenzie Brothers... If pop culture were a maze, Matthew would be the Minotaur at its center. Were it a mall, he'd be the Food Court. Were it a parking lot, he’d be the distant Cart Corral where the weird kids gather to smoke, but that’s not important right now... Matthew enjoys body surfing (so long as the bodies are fresh), writing in the third person, and dark-eyed women. Amongst his weaponry are such diverse elements as: Fear! Surprise! Ruthless efficiency! An almost fanatical devotion to pop culture! And a nice red uniform.

    Related Posts

    Critical Hit #792: Matthew Discovers Fire (WMS01-E03)

    Read More

    Top Five Movies 2005-2010 Edition

    Read More

    Major Spoilers Podcast #1133: The Fight of the Century

    Read More

    11 Comments

    1. Georgedubya on June 27, 2012 12:24 pm

      Eternal youth/life

      Seriously, without a TON of other advancements in technology and society, the ability to live indefinitely would cause so many problems.

      • Mela on June 27, 2012 12:44 pm

        You took my answer, darn it. Even a normal lifespan feels too long sometimes.

      • Ryan 'Halite' King on June 27, 2012 12:49 pm

        It essentially destroys any hope for wealth distribution to shift.

    2. Frank on June 27, 2012 12:41 pm

      Self aware robots. You could go Asimov’s way or Skynet. Given the level of human stupidity out there, it will probably be Skynet.

      There is currently concern over putting guns on drones that patrol the U.S. Southern border….

      • Ryan 'Halite' King on June 27, 2012 12:56 pm

        Personally I have a few arguments against this being an issue

        Self aware robots of high quality of intelligence would have to be treated as equal to humans, or at least an elevated status (dogs have more rights than ants). Why make a hyper intelligent robot to send it into a mine? It’s not cost effective.

        Humans are too selfish to let robots become smarter than us, we will inevitably combine the parts of superior computational speed and power of machines into ourselves.

        Computers as they are will likely be limited to a different type of intelligence since they are computationally based instead of pattern based. We have to use very complicated systems and software in order to get a computer than can accurately do the sort of things a human 2 year old can. My son rattles off about every passing car, its color, its type, recognize the similarities in trucks… he multiply huge numbers, or process 1million credit card transactions though. I personally feel that we should re-brand current ‘artificial intelligence’ as ‘simulated intelligence’

        • Ryan 'Halite' King on June 27, 2012 12:57 pm

          Missed a can’t in there, he can’t multiply

        • ikdks on June 29, 2012 2:50 pm

          Read I, Robot. One day robots will build robots that will build robots, and once we get through a couple of iterations, the robots will get too complex for human minds to understand. Its called emergence, the idea that simple forces can create patterns more complex than themselves. Niagara Falls is just gravity and water, the Grand Canyon is water wind and time.

          Then there’s life’s instinctive need to create life. The world is full of potential Geppettos and Frankenstein’s that are only held at bay by limitations of the technology of their time. Once that is lifted, people will be building children, friends, and of course lovers. It’s inevitable. In fact, we may see it.

    3. Ryan 'Halite' King on June 27, 2012 1:02 pm

      I’m going to take issue with Star Trek.

      Teleporters are an evil technology that I think would have to work like the one in the Prestige where a clone is created and the original destroyed. Not to mention their potential for abuse. We could simply shoot enemies into the center of the Earth.

      Replicators destroy the economy and pretty much destroy the innovative drive. Need a new Enterpirse, let’s replicate it!

      Not just Star Trek, but another BttF issue as well. Backwards Time Travel. I don’t want to know what horrors could abound from that.

    4. Russ Catt on June 27, 2012 2:35 pm

      Time Travel.
      Seems like a great idea until you think of the ramifications of people from multiple points in time traveling back to a fixed point.
      I don’t remember the bible mentioning that the crucifixion involved stadium seating for thousands of attendees whose number would only increase as more people in the relative future decided to travel back to that point.

      Plus, then someone steps on a butterfly or somesuch and then the future is ruled by insects :)

    5. B.V.K. on June 27, 2012 2:49 pm

      Lightsabers, there would be soooooo many severed limbs of teenagers that did stupid stuff with them. However I guess that would not technically be future technology since it happened a long time ago.

      • Alisha Mynx on June 27, 2012 9:45 pm

        My guess is that by the time that kind of tech becomes portable, there would also be some sort of protection field or lower grade “practice” models that are nothing more harmful than nerf bats with a slight sting (think the lightsaber batons on Futurama or even the Star Wars Expanded Universe practice lightsabers). Sure, there would still be plenty of severed parts, but fewer than there would normally be since most people would probably go for the cheaper low power practice model.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    6.0
    July 13, 2025

    Unchosen #1 Review

    6.3
    July 13, 2025

    Retro Review: Marvel Team-Up #95

    8.7
    July 11, 2025

    Fantastic Four #1 Review

    6.0
    July 8, 2025

    JSA #9 Review

    7.0
    July 7, 2025

    X-Men: Hellfire Vigil #1 Review

    Patreon Support
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT