Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    Major Spoilers

    Major Spoilers Question Of The Day: Naked Truth Edition

    Matthew PetersonBy Matthew PetersonMay 7, 2012Updated:June 14, 20139 Comments1 Min Read

    In this week’s Retro Review, I covered a notorious 60-year-old comic book that was once pilloried for it’s…  Umm…  Let’s euphemize it as “exuberant” depictions of the female form.  These days, it’s commonplace for our favorite characters to have adult sexual relationships, urges and attitudes, and they’re generally not expected to curve the spine, warp the soul or cause hirsute palms among the audience.  The Japanese, always ahead of the perv curve, have a specific term for it:  Fanservice, literally giving the fans what they presume they want to see.

    The MS-QOTD (pronounced, as always, “misquoted”) is simple:  Do pop culture cheesecake/beefcake moments make you smile or make you cringe?

    Major Spoilers Question Of The Day
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleNew Comic Releases for May 09, 2012
    Next Article DIGITAL COMICS: ComiXology joins Comic Book Legal Defense Fund
    Matthew Peterson
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Once upon a time, there was a young nerd from the Midwest, who loved Matter-Eater Lad and the McKenzie Brothers... If pop culture were a maze, Matthew would be the Minotaur at its center. Were it a mall, he'd be the Food Court. Were it a parking lot, he’d be the distant Cart Corral where the weird kids gather to smoke, but that’s not important right now... Matthew enjoys body surfing (so long as the bodies are fresh), writing in the third person, and dark-eyed women. Amongst his weaponry are such diverse elements as: Fear! Surprise! Ruthless efficiency! An almost fanatical devotion to pop culture! And a nice red uniform.

    Related Posts

    Major Spoilers Podcast #1133: The Fight of the Century

    Read More

    Geek History Lesson – Wakanda MEGA EPISODE (Black Panther, Shuri, Dora Milaje, Ironheart)

    Read More

    Munchkin Land #726: Marvel Champions: Civil War

    Read More

    9 Comments

    1. Ricco on May 7, 2012 11:52 am

      It’s somewhat expected now days, some are capable of integrating it into the storyline and some don’t, but I don’t really have a problem/bias towards it. We live in the internet world, you can find much worse if you just look for it…

    2. Russ Catt on May 7, 2012 12:03 pm

      During my teen years, it was definitely more of a smile (even though all the X-women had the same basic body design)

      These days, it’s definitely more cringe. I really want comics whose art accentuates the story and not drowns it out.

    3. Xian on May 7, 2012 12:49 pm

      Depends on the larger context and a number of factors including, but not limited to:
      – Was I expecting it?
      – Has this historically been a typical source for it (irrespective of my expectations)?
      – Is it gratuitous or graphic in fact or just in concept?
      – Is the tone playful, fun, a non-issue… or intentionally lustful?
      – Are there any elements of subjugation, non-consensual, underage, incest, etc.?
      – Would the subject object to being objectified / how empowered is the subject?
      – “Smell test”: Do I feel dirty afterwards? Is it creepy? How comfortable would you be sharing the material to a random sampling of your acquaintances?

    4. Mela on May 7, 2012 1:25 pm

      Honestly it all depends on the context. Artists like Amanda Connor who can integrate cheesecake into the story & do it with a sense of humor are far more likable than the types who just decide to draw someone in that “I’m fixing my car by humping it” posture just because they can.

      Oh, and beefcake fanservice people? Same applies, but all the examples I can think of are bad. Not every girl has a thing for guys with Cable’s questionable anatomy, thankyouverymuch.

    5. Ryan on May 7, 2012 5:15 pm

      Remember Vartox from Amanda Connor’s Power Girl? I laughed out loud when he was introduced.

    6. B.V.K. on May 7, 2012 6:48 pm

      I smile, then cringe at myself for doing it.

    7. Oldcomicfan on May 7, 2012 7:54 pm

      You know, it really just depends on the comic. All the cheesecake in Dave Steven’s Rocketeer? Hubba Hubba! The ridiculous scanty costumes worn by just about every female Marvel character. Ho hum. The depictions that really annoy me are those showing a woman wearing a blouse or sweater where every single curve shows. Have these artists never seen a clothed woman? The fabric drapes from the edge of the “porch” (as it were) down to her waist. It doesn’t follow the underside of the boob in defiance of gravity! The other thing I find completely ridiculous is swords-women in chainmail bikinis. Having so little on competely negates the value of the armor in the first place. If getting it on or some cheesecake advances the story, I am all for it. But when it’s just gratuitious, or the artist doesn’t even get the anatomy or fabric right, then it annoys me more often than not. I expect Little Annie Fannie to run around au naturel, that’s the whole point of that comic. Frank Miller used gratuitious nudity in his Dark Knight saga to emphasize how degraded and depraved Gotham society had become. That was okay, too. And then there’s characters like Witchblade who was clad in nothing but boogers. Yuck. Hand me a kleenex, quick!!!

    8. Michael on May 7, 2012 8:14 pm

      I always have to take things like this on a case-by-case basis citing things like context, the artwork itself, the costume design and so on.

      For instance, reading a story where the Legion’s Cosmic Boy is running around in a costume that was basically Jean Grey’s Black Queen outfit minus the cape did and still can make me feel a touch odd if I were to be reading it out in public. However, I’d be fine with reading Starslayer (before the addition of the body stocking) in public.

    9. MaximusRift on May 7, 2012 9:31 pm

      Cheesecake/Beefcake moments do not make me smile.

      Cheesecake/Beefcake moments do not make me cringe.

      Cheesecake/Beefcake moments make me go “Meh”.

      In all seriousness it all depends on the amount and the context where it is portrayed.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    6.0
    July 8, 2025

    JSA #9 Review

    7.0
    July 7, 2025

    X-Men: Hellfire Vigil #1 Review

    5.7
    July 6, 2025

    Gehenna: Naked Aggression #1 Review

    7.0
    July 6, 2025

    Retro Review: Big Apple Comix (September 1975)

    6.0
    July 5, 2025

    Wolverines and Deadpools #1 Review

    Patreon Support
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT