Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    DC

    NEW 52 REVIEW: Grifter #1

    George ChimplesBy George ChimplesSeptember 16, 2011Updated:September 16, 201119 Comments3 Mins Read

    Wildstorm meets DC as Grifter crashes into the relaunched universe. Does Grifter have the goods or is it all an elaborate con?

    GRIFTER #1
    Story: Nathan Edmonson
    Pencils: CAFU
    Inker: Jason Gorder
    Colorist: Andrew Dalhouse
    Letterer: Wes Abbott
    Assistant Editor: Katie Kubert
    Editor: Bobbie Chase
    Cover: CAFU & Bit
    Publisher: DC Comics
    Price: $2.99

    Previously, on Grifter:  In the old DCU, Grifter didn’t exist. He was brought over from Wildstorm, where he was a member of the WildC.A.T.s, fighting Daemonites and such… I think he tried to sell batteries once.

    “DAMNED GRIFTER CONNED ME!”

    Well, I feel like I just got grifted. Grifter #1 only works if you view it as some sort of meta-commentary about suckering comic book readers into parting with their hard earned two dollars and ninety-nine cents. Otherwise, it’s a complete mess.

    In the opening pages, while enjoying some rather spacious air travel accommodations, Cole Cash hears some voices, stabs some chick in the eye, bluffs the air crew into thinking a tiny wine bottle is a bomb, and jumps out into the water. Apparently, while running the old briefcase-full-of-cash-switcheroo on some generic sleazebag, Cash Cole had the misfortune of getting shanghaied by aliens or demons, but he escaped and now he’s missing time and hearing voices and everyone hates him. Oh yeah, and the US Army wants his brother to kill him because we need warmed-over action movie clichés that strain credulity

    Cole as a protagonist is woefully uninteresting, and in fact, contradictory. In one panel, he’s wringing his hands over beating someone who forcefully abducted him, yet has no problem stabbing someone in the eyeball and then threatening a plane full of civilian passengers. We learn he’s a conman who used to work for Delta Force, but absolutely nothing of substance or interest to hang a solo title on. The great reveal at the end is that he stole a mask from a costume shop that happens to look exactly like Grifter’s classic face covering and that he’s going to… run away. Yay.

    NOT FOR ME

    I’ve seen some good words offered to CAFU’s art but man, I did not like the art in this issue. The perspective and spacing just seemed wrong to me. The coloring is well done, and CAFU puts a lot of detail into his backgrounds, which I appreciate. He also plays with the panels and space to lend a nice feeling of motion to the action. But CAFU fails to provide a realistic feel to the people on the page, and the alien design is far too derivative to be threatening. I can see why CAFU appeals to some, but the art rubbed me the wrong way.

    AM I BEING TOO HARSH?

    Grifter #1 confused and frustrated me, but that’s just one man’s opinion. There’s a bit of action, and if you like CAFU, you’ll enjoy the book more than I did. It seems Nathan Edmonson is going for a They Live meets Total Recall action vibe, which is a noble pursuit, but the opening salvo was not effective. Your mileage may vary, but my verdict is approach this book with caution. One star.

    [rating:1/5]

    dc comics grifter New 52 Review Wildstorm
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleNEW 52 REVIEW: Suicide Squad #1
    Next Article DC RELAUNCH: The Ray announced
    George Chimples
    • Twitter

    George Chimples comes from the far future, where comics are outlawed and only outlaws read comics. In an effort to prevent that horrible dystopia from ever coming into being, he has bravely traveled to the past in an attempt to change the future by ensuring that comics are good. Please do not talk to him about grandfather paradoxes. He likes his comics to be witty, trashy fun with slightly less pulp than a freshly squeezed glass of OJ. George’s favorite comic writers are Warren Ellis and Grant Morrison, while his preferred artists are Guy Davis and Chris Bachalo, He loves superheroes, but also enjoys horror, science fiction, and war comics. You can follow him @TheChimples on Twitter for his ramblings regarding comics, Cleveland sports, and nonsense.

    Related Posts

    Geek History Lesson – Superman is Better than Batman

    Read More

    COMICS PORTAL: Magazines Promoting the Movies!

    Read More

    SDCC’25: DC Comics announces convention plans as well as march to 100th anniversary

    Read More

    19 Comments

    1. jeff on September 16, 2011 9:03 pm

      Appreciate the honesty. I didn’t pick it up either. Only got Batwoman & Resurrection Man this week.

    2. Paul on September 17, 2011 2:50 am

      This is the first comment for me on this site, but I just had to state for the record my opinion. Wow, I couldn’t possibly disagree with you more on this. This issue one of my favorites so far in the launch (along with Batgirl and Death Stroke). I loved the art and the writing too. There isn’t a ton of innovation in it, but it left me wanting more. I have no idea what you mean by it is trying to con folks out of their money, but I am new to comics. This relaunch is my very first foray into comic books. I am 30 years old and never dipped my toe in the water before, although I always wanted to. So, maybe my perspective is one of that “new reader,” but in a way I think that gives me a unique perspective. Anyway, I appreciate your view. I just wanted to state some counter points. For me Grifter gets 4 Stars (for what it is worth Death Stroke: 4 stars, and Batgirl: 5 stars.)

      • Matthew Peterson on September 17, 2011 7:40 am

        I have no idea what you mean by it is trying to con folks out of their money, but I am new to comics

        The words “Grifter” is an old term for a con man, specifically one who gets by on minor gimmicks to bilk people out of their money, so the reviewer was making a joke there… And as for the comic itself, your take on it is what matters to you. Your mileage on any given review may vary, and one man’s poison is another’s man’s venom.

        Thanks for the feedback, Paul, and feel free to keep commenting.

      • Stephen Schleicher on September 17, 2011 12:06 pm

        Congrats on posting your first comment! Welcome to the Major Spoilers Experience.

      • Jimmy on September 17, 2011 12:15 pm

        I’m more with Mr. Chimples on this one, and was similarly disappointed with Deathstroke, but I’m pretty sure in both cases it’s merely that this comic wasn’t aimed towards me. I think some of the New 52 are aimed toward newer comic readers, and getting them on board, while some are heavily weighted toward keeping the old readers happy. I definitely felt Deathstroke was intended for a newer audience, (my impression was for a teenage audience, but the thrill of an action scene can certainly appeal to all ages), and Grifter felt about the same for me.

        I’m definitely glad you enjoyed it though; there needs to be comics for everyone–after all, I can’t get into Legion titles, but that doesn’t mean they’re inherently bad comics :)

      • George Chimples on September 18, 2011 12:53 am

        Hey Paul, I appreciate your view too. I’m glad you enjoyed Grifter, and decided to comment about it here. If a comic leaves you wanting more, it has done its job and it looks like Grifter hit the right buttons for you.

        Reviews are just one fan’s perspective, and it’s good to have a diverse set of opinions presented in the comments or elsewhere. I’m glad the relaunch is bringing in new readers like you – the more comic readers, the merrier!

      • Alex O. on September 22, 2011 2:48 pm

        Hey Paul. I’m a 34 year old who’s also always been interested in comics, but never really picked up one before. That changed this summer with the “Green Lantern” movie. I thought “surely, the comics should be better than this”. So, I spent a few dollars on some comics while heavily anticapating the New 52. I read “Grifter” and as a new reader, I’d have to agree with the review. The story was more perplexing than intriguing featuring a “hero” with almost zero personality. The cover art seems to promote another “Deathstroke”, but alas, I felt the first issue was well-done, but was ultimately a mess. Too little explanation and a boring protagonist doesn’t add up to much. I don’t think I’ll follow up with Issue # 2. 1 1/2 stars out of 4. “Batman” # 1 (on the other hand) is a masterpiece.

        • Matthew Peterson on September 22, 2011 3:33 pm

          “Batman” # 1 (on the other hand) is a masterpiece.

          Welcome to comics (and to Major Spoilers) Alex… Stick around, because we’re working on coverage of all this week’s New 52, including Batman #1 over the next few days. Watch the skies… :)

        • Damascus on September 22, 2011 6:33 pm

          Yeah, I agree, I really highly enjoyed Batman #1. I’ll save my comments for the review page on that one, but I’m completely in agreement.

    3. seneca on September 17, 2011 10:09 am

      I just dont see how a guy like Grifter can last long in a world with a Batman.

      • Matthew Peterson on September 17, 2011 10:51 am

        Batman is different, in theory, so perhaps Grifter is designed to fit a niche Bats no longer fills?

    4. Paul on September 17, 2011 12:45 pm

      I am a 10 year military veteran with special forces background. So, that probably says it all as far as why Death Stroke and Grifter have appeal for me. I can identify with both characters in some way. That essentially is what I look for in any book, comic or otherwise. I just really enjoy the potential of a “sweet talker” with a military background, because I can tell you military background (especially SF) that is a smooth talker is an interesting combo. I don’t know where they go from here but I like the potential. I also love the Punisher, so, there ya go. I guess now that I type it out, it is just the kind of characters I love. Great comments so far too, by the way.

    5. Ian on September 17, 2011 2:32 pm

      Grifter has possibly the worst costume for a cover feature character in the history of the medium.

      • Matthew Peterson on September 17, 2011 7:45 pm

        Grifter has possibly the worst costume for a cover feature character in the history of the medium.

        Really?

        • DrNobody on September 18, 2011 5:08 am

          Powdered Toast Man’s costume is WAAAAAAY better than Grifter’s… And… Well… A LOT of the costumes in DCNU, actually…..

    6. Damascus on September 20, 2011 3:46 am

      I didn’t hate this issue, I think the concept is interesting, if not a lot reminiscent of They Live like George said. I didn’t like the jumps which were on almost every page it felt like. There was also another issue, small though it may be, at first he thinks he’s been knocked out for 17 minutes, okay so he’s checking his watch 17 minutes later in the day on an entirely different day, fine. Then he’s informed that it’s actually been 17 days that he’s been out of it and Gretchen thinks he’s cheated her out of the money, but at the end of the comic when he’s in the cemetary he says he “I want my seventeen hours back.” So which is it? minutes, days or hours?

      • Paul on September 23, 2011 3:40 am

        I didn’t catch that before. After reading through it again I realize that you are right on the money. I hate that too, because that is just bad writing and worse editing. That actually ruins this issue for me. In this big relaunch I can’t believe that slipped through the gates. New rating: 2 out of 5.

    7. Damascus on September 20, 2011 3:50 am

      I didn’t think the art was all that bad, it didn’t stand out as beautifully as the art in Batwoman, but honestly I think it’s better than all the color scenes in Animal Man (granted I loved Animal Man while I only kinda liked Grifter).

      I know art appreciation is subjective and when I posted a comment on Animal Man’s review the overwhelming opinion expressed there was very positive on the art, and while I really like the black and white (and kinda red all over) the art felt very amateurish to me. My comment on that page honestly sums that up better than I can right here.

    8. brenton8090 on September 25, 2011 8:05 am

      I ended this issue frustratrated and confused. It felt random and forced. I was still onboard for issue #2 at least, until he puts his mask on. From what I could read, he hadn’t been “Grifter” yet, and if that is his big superhero origin moment, putting on some random mask from a costume store after freaking out about his abduction (or something? Not very clear.) It’s a moment that makes me throw up my hands and shout “DONE!”.

      If you like it, fine, and good luck. But not for me, thank you.

      And what’s with all this level-headed, reasoned discourse, where people are encouraged to disagree politely with each other? I thought this was a comic book site! I want more VENOM and RAGE! Guess I’ll have to save that for Red Lanterns #1.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    6.0
    July 13, 2025

    Unchosen #1 Review

    6.3
    July 13, 2025

    Retro Review: Marvel Team-Up #95

    8.7
    July 11, 2025

    Fantastic Four #1 Review

    6.0
    July 8, 2025

    JSA #9 Review

    7.0
    July 7, 2025

    X-Men: Hellfire Vigil #1 Review

    Patreon Support
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT