Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    Movies

    G.I. Joe in theaters today, who’s going to see it?

    Stephen SchleicherBy Stephen SchleicherAugust 7, 200914 Comments1 Min Read

    G.I. Joe arrives in theaters today, and with all the negative comments I’ve seen from those who speculate the film is going to be bad, I wonder how many are going to see it today?  Rotten Tomatoes has the tomato meter at 41% positive on opening morning.

    Did you see it already?  Did you like it?

    g i joe negative comments rotten tomatoes Theaters tomato
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBarbarella remake in the works
    Next Article The Secret Warriors infiltrate the Thunderbolts
    Stephen Schleicher
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Stephen Schleicher began his career writing for the Digital Media Online community of sites, including Digital Producer and Creative Mac covering all aspects of the digital content creation industry. He then moved on to consumer technology, and began the Coolness Roundup podcast. A writing fool, Stephen has freelanced for Sci-Fi Channel's Technology Blog, and Gizmodo. Still longing for the good ol' days, Stephen launched Major Spoilers in July 2006, because he is a glutton for punishment. You can follow him on Twitter @MajorSpoilers and tell him your darkest secrets...

    Related Posts

    Geek History Lesson – Batman Movie Draft with DJ Wooldridge & Diego Anthony Nuñez

    Read More

    DC Studios Drops 2 Big Trailers! – Did You Hear? week of Friday, May 16th, 2025

    Read More

    Geek History Lesson – Will Mission Impossible the Final Reckoning be the Final Installment? with DJ Wooldridge

    Read More

    14 Comments

    1. Stacy B. on August 7, 2009 10:42 am

      Gonna pass.

      Not because of all the bad publicity or the questionable casting choices or the bizarre costume changes, but because….

      Okay, not gonna lie, not even Ray Parks as Snake-Eyes or Eccelston as Destro makes me brave enough to go see this. I’ll admit it, I love the cartoon, toys and comics I grew up with. I’ll re-watch Warren Elli’s great little web animated G.I. Joe series and think about what might have been.

      Reply
    2. Ricco on August 7, 2009 11:49 am

      If only it WAS G.I. Joe, for what I’ve seen it’s Team America with slightly better special effects and a couple of references to the Sigma Six anime instead of the original cartoon. PASS!

      Reply
    3. hermit on August 7, 2009 11:50 am

      it’s not because i think they f***ed G.I.Joe, i just think this look like a bad movie. i will see it, but i’m not gonna pay 15$ for it.

      Reply
    4. Navarre on August 7, 2009 11:58 am

      It seems most of the people I know who aren’t comic fans are looking forward to the fun of seeing it. Part of the interest seems to be that they find the actors physically appealing.

      Meanwhile, fans of the comic are passing it by on one principle or another.

      Somewhere, The Catwoman Fan League is saying “I told you so.”

      Reply
    5. eric on August 7, 2009 12:21 pm

      I am a comic fan, but I have never followed the GI Joe comics or the animated series. I saw the movie last night at a midnight showing. I loved it, and I am not an action movie fan. The writing was not the best and did not gel and flow until the desert scene. After that the movie got much better, the writing better, and the acting was better. I did not have high expectations for the movie going in. The flashbacks were good and told enough to inform about back grounds. I wish they had let Marlon Wayans ad lib more for more comedy. All the purists can hate it, but love that piece of Star Trek crap that was out earlier this year. I will look forward for the second installment.

      Reply
    6. nu on August 7, 2009 12:25 pm

      I saw it last night at midnight and enjoyed it. There were some changes that I did not agree with but it was still an overall good movie. This movie was mainly setting us up for the next one. I thought the flashbacks were handled well.

      YO JOE. oh and knowing is half the battle…

      Reply
    7. Jacin B on August 7, 2009 2:18 pm

      I’m intending to see it this weekend.

      As I’ve stated before, those of you “purists” who aren’t seeing it because it isn’t just exactly like the cartoon ought to be thankful that it’s not exactly like the cartoon and, as great as Larry Hama’s work might’ve been, there are a lot of bits of the comics that were just as dumb as the cartoon was.

      Larry Hama, who everyone is (rightfully) quick to praise, collaborated on the development of this movie. His hands are in this pie. So, keep that in mind when you’re hating on it for not sticking closely enough to his vision.

      I’ve read the comic adaptation (something I’d wager most of the people here have not done) and found it to be a reasonable translation of the G.I.Joe universe, modernizing it and bringing into a more believable state of existence.

      If the actual movie itself is anywhere close to that, it should be a decent sci-fi action movie filled with characters that we’ve loved since we were kids. Just like Star Trek was.

      But, can we reserve judgment until after we’ve seen the movies themselves, instead of basing our opinions off of nothing more than a few quick glimspes from the previews? Seriously. It’s getting tiring.

      Reply
    8. Alex on August 7, 2009 3:13 pm

      Went to see it two hours ago. I liked it. Damn, Snake Eyes is badass.

      Reply
    9. Alimayo Arango on August 7, 2009 3:38 pm

      I have been watching,reading the comics, and collecting the toys for more than 20 years. I saw the movie last night and like it a lot. The acting for Duke could have been better and some of the CGI effects looked a little lame but the story was fast paced and entertaining and even with the black costumes it just felt like GIJOE to me. You people are missing out if you don’t go to see this movie.

      Reply
    10. Navarre on August 7, 2009 5:48 pm

      I agree with Jacin that we should reserve judgement until viewing. I was joking about the Catwoman thing.

      I believe it is impossible to form a valid opinion on anything unless we have some reference for the experience. We must also be careful that our method of evaluation is not biased as well.

      For example, even if Uwe Boll has made nothing but crap movies, it is possible that he will create something brilliant. It may not seem likely based on past experience but I could also miss out if I never give the next film a chance.

      I guess I’m at least saying I’d rather take a chance with an open mind than know I was disappointed because of my refusal to try.

      Reply
    11. Brother129 on August 7, 2009 9:57 pm

      Saw it and loved it for what it was a cool action movie (light on acting and plot development) that sufficiently tweaked all of my G.I. Joe nostalgia….

      Reply
    12. Scott C. on August 8, 2009 4:09 pm

      Meh. I haven’t seen it and not looking to either. Once I saw the ad with the X-Clrator or whatever suits I was not on board. They should have gone with the formula Star Trek or Dark Knight followed. Acknowledge your past in the case of Star Trek but don’t linger. With the Dark Knight keep things just enough in reality but stretch where you need so things can get crazy. I would have been excited to saw a Joe movie where they hunt down shadow organization cobra not “I’m going to blow up the effiel tower” and now people in Iron Man costumes are coming to get me silliness.

      Reply
    13. Jacin B on August 10, 2009 11:14 am

      @ Navarre: Now, don’t get me wrong. I think Uwe Boll’s track record is such that you can pretty much make an accurate judgment call on his movies until you see a large group of people praising one.

      I just think that, in this case, we’ve got a bunch of people standing on one side saying, “I’m never going to see this! I can tell they’ve butchered my childhood just from the previews!” and a group on the other going, “You know, actually, I saw it and it was really pretty good and really did a good job capturing the spirit and fun of G.I.Joe.”

      When it comes to movie reviews, I’m always going to give a little more credence to the people who’ve actually seen it rather than the ones who refuse to because they don’t like something they saw a split-second flash of in a 30-second preview of a 120-minute movie.

      Reply
    14. Ricco on August 10, 2009 3:42 pm

      When it comes to spending 30+ dollars I’m very much a “judge a book by it’s cover” kind of movie guy. If I hear enough good reviews I might go see it, but at those prices I’ll probably wait for the dvd.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    4.7
    May 20, 2025

    Huck: Big Bad World #1 Review

    8.3
    May 19, 2025

    Godzilla vs. X-Men Review

    7.0
    May 18, 2025

    Retro Review: Superman In The Computers That Saved Metropolis (July 1980)

    8.0
    May 17, 2025

    Exquisite Corpses #1 Review

    7.0
    May 16, 2025

    Supergirl #1 Review

    Patreon Support
    Major Spoilers Store
    Recent Comments
    • Low Voltage Tech on PREVIEW: Godzilla vs. Los Angeles
    • Luis Dantas on Storm #8 Review
    • Michael Kenchington on PREVIEW: Giant-Size Wacky Races #1
    • derrigable on COMICS PORTAL: To (Almost) Everything, There Is a Season!
    • wiley on COMICS PORTAL: ‘Mouse Guard’ Is Back!
    Subscribe to the Major Spoilers E-Mail List
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT