Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    DC

    Review: Battle for the Cowl #3

    Stephen SchleicherBy Stephen SchleicherMay 25, 200920 Comments4 Mins Read

    BFTC_Cv3Picon.jpg

    The action between the lords of the Gotham underground has heated up to the point where villains are taking down villains, buildings are blowing up left and right, and the… what?  You don’t remember seeing much, if any, of that action in the pages of Batman: Battle for the Cowl?

    BFTC_Cv3.jpgIf you only read the three issues of Battle for the Cowl, in hopes of understanding what is going on, I hope you went in knowing that the story was going to be all chopped up with little in the way of big picture exposition.

    The biggest and best implication of Battle for the Cowl is that Jason Todd could be the gun-totting Batman, and the new Black Mask.  The shadowed figure sitting in a chair, wearing the Jason’s trademark garb was a pretty big clue, but having him spout out Black Mask’s name during his fight with Dick, even after Dick started the issue saying no one knew who was blowing up Gotham real good, seemed to be the revealing clue.   But knowing the writer’s whim, and DC editorial swing whichever way it wants these days, the Black Mask answer could still be up in the air.  After all, Jason did fall over the falls just like Sherlock Holmes (and the Joker, in Morrison’s last RIP issue).

    One thing is for certain, by the end of this issue, we all know Dick Grayson is the new Batman… for now.  Even if DC jumped up and down screaming in our faces saying the ending wouldn’t be the ending we expected.  Really DC?  Really?  I think following this stunt, and the three stunts before this, readers are wise to the bull, meaning the company is really going to have to try harder to get back into our good graces.

    It would be nice if DC pulled a Marvel by finally elevating Dick/Bucky to top of the hero list for longer than 24 issues.  The current change just seems so empty because we know Bruce Wayne is alive.  And this is the real problem with everything going on in the DC Universe right now.  When we know death is not permanent, that those that die will be back within a three year time-period, why should the reader care about the characters any longer?

    For Batman, we’ve already been through the battle for the mantle in Knight Fall, which turned out to be a better story in retrospect.  Unless DC grows a pair, and keeps Bruce in the coffin for the next thirty years, Dick’s time as Batman is short lived, and it seems we all know it.  When Barry Allen died, readers had a chance to see Wally grow and become a very unique Flash.  If we don’t get thirty years – heck even five years would be interesting – of Dick as Batman, it will all be a waste of the reader/fan’s time, as comic publishers continue to scramble to snatch as much of the pie as possible with these get rich quick schemes.

    Was it a surprise that Dick is now Batman?  Nope.

    With Jason Todd out of the picture, and Damien wearing the new Robin costume, is it still a surprise who is appearing soon in the pages of Red Robin?  Nope.

    Do we even care any more?

    To be honest, I want to.  I really want Batman, Batman and Robin, Red Robin, Detective Comics, Gotham City Sirens, Batman: Streets of Gotham, Batman Confidential, and the hundreds of other Batman titles to be really good again.  I really want these series to succeed (even the grant morrison one).  I want these titles to be the top twenty titles on the Diamond sales list each month.  Why aren’t they?   And what needs to change to make that happen?  Here’s hoping the answer can be found in the next four months.

    I really don’t think Tony Daniel is to blame for this mess.  He did give readers explosions, and big fight scenes, as we got to see Gotham fall… again.  Battle for the Cowl a predictable story; one that seems to have been cobbled together from all the big Batman events from the last twenty years.  On the other hand, Tony’s art was pretty good.  There were times when his art styles almost had me thinking I was looking at early Jim Lee work.

    Sans Black Mask twist/reveal, Battle for the Cowl #3 was really anticlimactic as far as major events go, earning 2 out of 5 Stars.  A whole lotta predictable wrapped up in a shiny wrapper being pitched as new and Earth shattering… again.

    2stars.jpg

    Batman big picture black mask bucky Clue Dc Universe dick grayson exposition garb good graces HERO implication issue one Jason Todd Joker one thing sherlock holmes Stunts villains Whim
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleMSP#100 Reminder: The Major Spoilers Experience
    Next Article Art Appreciation Moment of the Day: Dave Johnson
    Stephen Schleicher
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Stephen Schleicher began his career writing for the Digital Media Online community of sites, including Digital Producer and Creative Mac covering all aspects of the digital content creation industry. He then moved on to consumer technology, and began the Coolness Roundup podcast. A writing fool, Stephen has freelanced for Sci-Fi Channel's Technology Blog, and Gizmodo. Still longing for the good ol' days, Stephen launched Major Spoilers in July 2006, because he is a glutton for punishment. You can follow him on Twitter @MajorSpoilers and tell him your darkest secrets...

    Related Posts

    The Death of the Silver Surfer #1 Review

    Read More

    Retro Review: Master Comics #11 (February 1941)

    Read More

    Marvel United: A Pride Special Review

    Read More

    20 Comments

    1. Ricco on May 25, 2009 4:17 pm

      The word “meh” sums up my feeling for this, RIP and anything related…

      Reply
    2. steviecool on May 25, 2009 5:40 pm

      I wanted to like this miniseries. Wanted to. Sigh.

      Reply
    3. Ricco on May 25, 2009 6:01 pm

      The first comic gave me the feeling of an ideologic fight between Jason and Dick/Tim on how far the new Batman will have to go to restablish “peace” in Gotham.

      I expected an awkward cooperation between Gun-Bat, Tim-Bat and Nightwing. Instead they went for a literal fight, with Tim as the Joker about to hit Jason with a crowbar no less!

      Reply
    4. Brother129 on May 25, 2009 6:49 pm

      I’m still thoroughly confused….who is Black Mask and how do we know?

      Reply
    5. andy on May 26, 2009 12:01 am

      I don’t think Jason is the Black Mask, but I agree that the new Black Mask’s identity was unfortunately the only intriguing part of this series. I really wanted this to be good, I really did, but everything was just so predictable. I’ve been patiently waiting for DC to bless us with another great Batman story –another Year One or Dark Knight Returns or Long Halloween — and here was a great chance to do that. But alas…

      Reply
    6. MechanisticMoth on May 26, 2009 12:57 am

      I completely agree with you, Stephen, I really wanted this series to do well. I really want Batman to do well. I want DC to do well. However, they just keep on shooting themselves in the foot. Shut up instead of publicizing something that we know you’re lying about… there’s more mystery involved that way. Sure, the reboot of the Bat-verse has a lot of opportunity especially with the Red Robin series, but I feel like Bruce will be back within the next couple years and DC will lose out on another great opportunity opened for them.

      Reply
    7. duckface on May 26, 2009 1:46 am

      I don’t think there ever was a chance that this series would be good. I bought it for completion’s sake, but statements made by Morrison indicate RIP was all the lead-in needed for Batman & Robin. DC obviously wanted to cash in on the death buzz, make some money off of 3 months of a inactive franchise, or, at best, provide readers with some background for the other Bat books (Batman, Detective etc).

      The only thing that disappoints me is that they STILL have yet to admit that it is Dick, by playing that little trick at the end. This pisses me off for two reasons: a) if it IS Dick, don’t treat us as if we’re idiots, and b) if it isn’t, which is VERY UNLIKELY, I will be very angry.

      Reply
    8. Josh on May 26, 2009 10:13 am

      To be perfectly honest, this a terrible review. 90% of it deals with the reviewers opinions about Batman RIP and not this actual issue of Battle for the Cowl #3. Was the issue paced well? How was the storytelling? Was the characterization good or bad? We have no idea as to what the reviewers opinions about these are, because no opinions were given.

      Reply
      • Stephen Schleicher on May 26, 2009 10:50 am

        You might want to read that again, as I only mentioned RIP in passing as it relates directly to how Jason Todd bites it in this issue. :D

        Reply
    9. Josh on May 26, 2009 4:32 pm

      Okay, I read it again. What does all of this…

      “Even if DC jumped up and down screaming in our faces saying the ending wouldn’t be the ending we expected. Really DC? Really? I think following this stunt, and the three stunts before this, readers are wise to the bull, meaning the company is really going to have to try harder to get back into our good graces.

      It would be nice if DC pulled a Marvel by finally elevating Dick/Bucky to top of the hero list for longer than 24 issues. The current change just seems so empty because we know Bruce Wayne is alive. And this is the real problem with everything going on in the DC Universe right now. When we know death is not permanent, that those that die will be back within a three year time-period, why should the reader care about the characters any longer?

      For Batman, we’ve already been through the battle for the mantle in Knight Fall, which turned out to be a better story in retrospect. Unless DC grows a pair, and keeps Bruce in the coffin for the next thirty years, Dick’s time as Batman is short lived, and it seems we all know it. When Barry Allen died, readers had a chance to see Wally grow and become a very unique Flash. If we don’t get thirty years – heck even five years would be interesting – of Dick as Batman, it will all be a waste of the reader/fan’s time, as comic publishers continue to scramble to snatch as much of the pie as possible with these get rich quick schemes.

      To be honest, I want to. I really want Batman, Batman and Robin, Red Robin, Detective Comics, Gotham City Sirens, Batman: Streets of Gotham, Batman Confidential, and the hundreds of other Batman titles to be really good again. I really want these series to succeed (even the grant morrison one). I want these titles to be the top twenty titles on the Diamond sales list each month. Why aren’t they? And what needs to change to make that happen? Here’s hoping the answer can be found in the next four months.”

      …have to do with the actual issue at hand? It tells me nothing of how Tony Daniel wrote or drew the issue. I mean seriously, you had exactly TWO sentences dealing with the art.

      I know you want to defend your review, but just face facts. It’s a bad one.

      Reply
    10. Dave on May 26, 2009 4:38 pm

      Uh, Josh…I have a Master’s degree, and I don’t see what you see.

      Reply
    11. Josh on May 26, 2009 5:50 pm

      Okay, I’ll make it simple and break out the sock puppets.

      The bulk of the review talks about the Batman titles in general and how dead isn’t dead in comics and something about Wally West and Captain America and here’s a list of new Batman books coming out soon and DC has no balls and Bruce Wayne should stay dead and here’s something about the state of comics and oh, yeah, Tony Daniel’s art looked nice.

      It’s like one long tangent with some actual review thrown on at the end as more or less an afterthought. I mean, this is supposed to be a comic book review, and there’s literally no mention about if the dialogue was good or bad, or if the characterization was good or bad, or if Daniel juggled the large cast well. It’s just a badly written review.

      Reply
    12. Ricco on May 26, 2009 5:55 pm

      @Josh: To quote Mr. Mackey from South Park: “Drugs are bad, M’kay”
      Of course Batman RIP is used in this review, this craptacular series was sold as a “conclusion” to RIP , conclusion my foot, it doesn’t even have an actual ending.

      Unless you haven’t noticed this isn’t an English literary debate forum, it’s a comic book forum and 99.99% of people come to read the reviews here because they WANT to know Matthew and Stephen’s opinion on comics and not some insipid academic analysis of every panel.

      Reply
    13. Josh on May 26, 2009 9:05 pm

      @ Ricco

      I wouldn’t want to read an insipid analysis of every panel either. Still, I don’t think it’s out of the question to expect a mention about characterization, storytelling, etc., in a review. These are the foundations of the medium. Imagine a review for The Dark Knight that spent 90% of it’s time dwelling on the Bat-franchise as a whole and ending with, “Oh and that Heath Ledger fellow was pretty good, too.” That’d be a pretty awful review.

      This is a silly debate anyway. Likely, it stems from my ongoing frustration with the lack of actual, professional journalism within the comics industry. It’s hard to take it with a grain a salt sometimes when it’s an industry that I personally have a lot vested in.

      Reply
    14. Brother129 on May 26, 2009 9:22 pm

      All this post needs now is Cory to show up…

      Reply
    15. Dave on May 26, 2009 10:33 pm

      Josh, not only do I have a Master’s degree…I’m a former journalist. Trust me, buckaroo, a lack of professional journalism is a problem in far more areas than the comics industry. Sounds like you have the seed sprouting for a blog of your own.

      Reply
    16. Stephen Schleicher on May 26, 2009 11:37 pm

      Josh, like we told Cory; everyone is entitled to their opinion. If you didn’t like my review, fine be me…

      Reply
    17. Josh on May 27, 2009 10:30 am

      @ Dave

      Clearly, a lack of professional journalism is something a great many industries deal with. Since the topic at hand deals with just one industry–comics–I chose to voice my frustrations with that. I specifically mentioned that the comics industry is something that I have a vested interest in. And being that you have a Master’s degree (congrats, by the way), I’m sure you can understand my reasons for being especially frustrated with the lack of journalistic integrity in this industry, while still recognizing the lack of journalistic intergrity in other industries. I actually am capable of recognizing things like that. Are you not?

      Reply
    18. Dave on May 27, 2009 6:59 pm

      Josh…I didn’t say what I said to be a dick. If you took it that way, I’m sorry.

      Reply
    19. Matthew Peterson on May 27, 2009 11:01 pm

      Josh’s perspective is as valid as anyone else’s, and you both make good points.

      I should like to state that I don’t speak for Stephen, but I think of what we do as less journalism and more gentle critique and analysis. Either way, the review is honest in what it conveys, I think the question is more of what a review SHOULD convey from a specific perspective. Your mileage, as always, may vary.

      Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    8.0
    June 15, 2025

    The Death of the Silver Surfer #1 Review

    4.7
    June 15, 2025

    Retro Review: Master Comics #11 (February 1941)

    9.0
    June 13, 2025

    Marvel United: A Pride Special Review

    6.3
    June 10, 2025

    X-Men #17 Review

    6.0
    June 9, 2025

    Power Rangers Prime #7 Review

    Patreon Support
    Major Spoilers Store
    Recent Comments
    • Nathan on Wayne’s Comics Podcast #696: Interview with Creators from Concrete Arcanum
    • Austin Cowboy on FIRST LOOK: Conan the Barbarian #21
    • Frank on COMICS PORTAL: Batman Meets… Deadpool!?
    • ZackaryTobias on COMICS PORTAL: Batman Meets… Deadpool!?
    • derrigable on COMICS PORTAL: I Want More than Good Memories!
    Subscribe to the Major Spoilers E-Mail List
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT