Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    DC

    Review: Arkham Asylum One-Shot

    Stephen SchleicherBy Stephen SchleicherApril 26, 20098 Comments4 Mins Read

    Out with the Old, In with the Wacky-in-the-Wikky-Woo

    arkhamasylum1picon.jpg

    While the Battle for the Cowl rages among Batman’s children (frankly, I’m pulling for Cassandra to become the new Batman), the house of cards that is Arkham Asylum has fallen down again, but this time it looks permanent.  The big names have escaped and are running amuck with Black Mask, but what of those inmates hidden deep within the bowels of the Asylum?  Oh yeah, you didn’t know about those guys, did you?

    arkhamasylum1cover.jpgThe Arkham Asylum one-shot features a lot of the inner monologue of Dr. Arkham as he returns to the shattered remains of the asylum recently blown up by Black Mask.  While he wanders the broken halls, he flashes back to the problems of the institute, and how his uncle wanted to build something completely different.

    Along the way, readers are introduced to three new inmates we’ve never been exposed to before.  First up is Alessio Morandi, who had his face ripped off by an angry father, and who now expresses himself to the world by painting his featureless face.  Next up is the Mirror Man who stumbled out of the forest years ago, and once he caught a look of himself in the mirror, can’t live without seeing himself from every angle. Finally, there is the Hamburger Lady, who has such a horribly disfigured face, that it is believed anyone who looks at her will die from fright.  All of these inmates are kept in “the Hole”, an off-limits maximum security area of the asylum, that only Dr. Arkham has access to.  Kind of strange that these three would make it into the off limits area, but loons like Clayface, Scarecrow, and the Joker never made it into the big leagues.

    As Dr. Arkham explains how he came to deal with these three, he suddenly comes to the conclusion that he needs to follow his uncle’s dream of making the asylum a place to embrace the idiosyncrasies of the inmates and let this be a haven for those who truly need a sanctuary to express diversity.  In other words, Dr. Arkham has embraced his inmates to the point where the line between patient and doctor is completely blurred.

    While this sounds like an interesting take on a new improved Arkham, I have a feeling we are being set up for another giant graphic novel that delves into the madness of the institute featuring the new Batman against an army of crazies.  I know, sounds really familiar, doesn’t it?  That would be shades of morrison ala 1989, and remember kiddies, he is returning to the Bat title this summer.  In a sense the three new characters could easily be replacements for The Joker, Two Face, and Clayface (or Scarecrow).  It’s almost like DC is cleaning house and introducing a whole new group of villains for Dick to fight once he puts on the cape and cowl.

    The biggest problem with the story is David Hine weaves the tale so it slips in and out of the past and present, causing the reader to momentarily wonder if there really are big name inmates still locked up in the nut-house.  It works to show how Arkham’s mind is working, but it causes the reader to invest even more mental powers into deciphering what is going on.  What I did like about Hine’s writing is in the very beginning of the issue he is giving off a Lovecraft vibe, that it had me really excited about the rest of the issue.  Unfortunately, all of that disappeared until the closing page when the Lovecraft style made a reappearance.

    Jeremy Haun’s art works in a way, but strangely it doesn’t quite jive with narration, as I expected a darker tone with high contrasts ala a dark horror movie, but instead readers are presented with a two tone color scheme of browns and greens.

    Why all these one-shots and specials?  Could DC be hinting at a new direction for the Batman universe, and are prepping us for the coming shake-up, or could it be a way writers who might not normally get the chance, to work on some Batman related books?    The answer of course is C) They’re in it for the money.  In any case, Arkham Asylum #1 is an issue that I think most readers could pass on and not miss a single story beat later.  Sadly, Arkham Asylum gets a very meh rating of 2.5 Stars.

    25stars.jpg

    alessio amuck angry father Arkham Asylum black mask Bowels featureless face hamburger lady house of cards idiosyncrasies inmates inner monologue loons maximum security area mirror man morandi rages Scarecrow Shot Features those guys
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleThings I Learned This Week: April 20 – 26, 2009
    Next Article REVIEW: No Hero #1 – 4
    Stephen Schleicher
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Stephen Schleicher began his career writing for the Digital Media Online community of sites, including Digital Producer and Creative Mac covering all aspects of the digital content creation industry. He then moved on to consumer technology, and began the Coolness Roundup podcast. A writing fool, Stephen has freelanced for Sci-Fi Channel's Technology Blog, and Gizmodo. Still longing for the good ol' days, Stephen launched Major Spoilers in July 2006, because he is a glutton for punishment. You can follow him on Twitter @MajorSpoilers and tell him your darkest secrets...

    Related Posts

    Major Spoilers Podcast #1127: HUCK!

    Read More

    Geek History Lesson – Batman Movie Draft with DJ Wooldridge & Diego Anthony Nuñez

    Read More

    DC Comics announces six new DC GO! titles launching in July

    Read More

    8 Comments

    1. duckface on April 26, 2009 11:24 pm

      I actually kind of like the idea that Dick (or whoever… but if it ain’t Dick I ain’t buying it) will have his own array of villains. Especially given the fact that for the last few years he’s pretty much been stuck with Bruce’s (and when he hasn’t, they’ve been utterly forgettable). Granted, it seems a tad forced and as you mention strange that Joker & co. have never been deemed mad enough to make it to the big leagues, and even stranger that Bruce never encountered them. But on the other hand I think there is plenty of room for new villains, and these 3 sound interesting. To be honest, I’m actually pretty excited based on the review. Maybe the new Batman will be around for longer than we think. I certainly hope so; 3 years of build-up for 1 year of a replacement? I don’t think so.

      Reply
    2. Lalo on April 26, 2009 11:57 pm

      i thought this issue was great it was a surprise to me how good it was especially after reading the manbat issue. those three new villains seem really cool and like thay can hang with the best of them at the least they can use these guys to spread bats good rough though what i hope would be more than just a year of a replacement after finishing this kinda made me want to read Grants Arkham Asylum again

      Reply
    3. Salieri on April 27, 2009 3:08 am

      I’m not sure Morrison would be relying on everyone to have read this one obscure tie-in to know the villains in his new B & R series – I’m thinking it’s more likely he’ll just use those wacky foes from Batman #666, like the Flamingo or Jackanapes.

      Reply
    4. nu on April 27, 2009 9:32 am

      they were in the hole not because they are monsters, it is just the opposite. they are insane and need help, but dr arkham even says something to the affect that they are removed from the general populace because they would be torn apart by the baddies

      Reply
    5. crood on April 27, 2009 9:35 am

      So, considering one off break outs occur daily at this place and giant mass breakouts occur for nearly every “event”, how is this guy still running the place?

      Reply
    6. ~wyntermute~ on April 27, 2009 2:14 pm

      “I’m not sure Morrison would be relying on everyone to have read this one obscure tie-in to know the villains in his new B & R series – I’m thinking it’s more likely he’ll just use those wacky foes from Batman #666, like the Flamingo or Jackanapes.”

      Yup. g-mo wants everybody else to respect _his_ ideas, and will ultimately pooh-pooh anything that doesn’t fit into _his_ grand vision. :) Prepare for the reign of Le Bossu!!! El Sombrero returns~! Dr. Hurt is not dead!

      Yikes. If any of that actually proves true, I’m sorry for even suggesting it!

      Reply
    7. Salieri on April 27, 2009 2:31 pm

      In all seriousness, Grant claims his ultimate goal is to have Five TPBs – Batman & Son, Black Glove, RIP, Batman & Robin, and…er…Return of Bruce Wayne?, that can be read in sequence, and all the rest of the tie-ins as completely optional reading.

      Really, “Battle For The Cowl” is basically DC using forceps to squeeze three issues into the close confines of a caption box that reads “A Few Months Later…”

      Reply
    8. ~wyntermute~ on April 28, 2009 3:00 pm

      Again in all seriousness, “Grant” has claimed a lot of things in the past… I will just wait and see what ACTUALLY occurs. Please, don’t take these as fighting-words, Salieri. :) If they are, it’s a fight with g-mo I’m itching for. But he could probably take me out one-handed, so maybe notsomuch. :D

      Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    4.7
    May 20, 2025

    Huck: Big Bad World #1 Review

    8.3
    May 19, 2025

    Godzilla vs. X-Men Review

    7.0
    May 18, 2025

    Retro Review: Superman In The Computers That Saved Metropolis (July 1980)

    8.0
    May 17, 2025

    Exquisite Corpses #1 Review

    7.0
    May 16, 2025

    Supergirl #1 Review

    Patreon Support
    Major Spoilers Store
    Recent Comments
    • Ideal Air HVAC on Top Five Things That Make You Instantly Happy
    • Low Voltage Tech on PREVIEW: Godzilla vs. Los Angeles
    • Luis Dantas on Storm #8 Review
    • Michael Kenchington on PREVIEW: Giant-Size Wacky Races #1
    • derrigable on COMICS PORTAL: To (Almost) Everything, There Is a Season!
    Subscribe to the Major Spoilers E-Mail List
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT