Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    DC

    Shazam! a No-Go

    Stephen SchleicherBy Stephen SchleicherJanuary 6, 20096 Comments2 Mins Read

    Shazam01.jpg

    Over at his blog, screenwriter John August gives a breakdown as to what happened to his Shazam! movie and how the execs at Warner Bros. cancelled the movie.

    When we turned the new draft in to the studio, we got a reaction that made me wonder if anyone at Warners had actually read previous drafts or the associated notes. The studio felt the movie played too young. They wanted edgier. They wanted Billy to be older. They wanted Black Adam to appear much earlier.

    His first draft, turned in before the writer’s strike, was more of a comedy than the darker, edgier feel Warner Bros. is now targeting for its superhero movies.

    In retrospect, I can point to two summer Warner Bros. movies that I believe defined the real issue at hand: Speed Racer and The Dark Knight. The first flopped; the second triumphed. Given only those two examples, one can understand why a studio might wish for their movies to be more like the latter. But to do so ignores the success of Iron Man, which spent most of its running time as a comedic origin story, and the even more pertinent example of WB’s own Harry Potter series. I tried to make this case, to no avail.

    August did go back and do a third rewrite, but the studios killed the project completely.  August reports that he probably won’t be back to write the movie again should the feature be resurrected for production.

    Read the entire story over at John’s blog, it is quite fascinating, and gives yet another peak into the workings of H’wood.

    via John August

    Avail dark knight Execs first draft hand speed Harry Potter harry potter series Iron Man issue at hand John August origin story Retrospect rewrite running time Shazam Movie Speed Racer superhero movies Warner Bros. Warners wb
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleWriter’s Strike Reprocussions Still Ripple Through Industry
    Next Article Marvel Unveils Silvestri Astonishing Tales #1 Cover
    Stephen Schleicher
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Stephen Schleicher began his career writing for the Digital Media Online community of sites, including Digital Producer and Creative Mac covering all aspects of the digital content creation industry. He then moved on to consumer technology, and began the Coolness Roundup podcast. A writing fool, Stephen has freelanced for Sci-Fi Channel's Technology Blog, and Gizmodo. Still longing for the good ol' days, Stephen launched Major Spoilers in July 2006, because he is a glutton for punishment. You can follow him on Twitter @MajorSpoilers and tell him your darkest secrets...

    Related Posts

    Act 4 Publishing and Skybound Entertainment announce Jim Aparo’s DC Classics Artist’s Edion

    Read More

    COMICS PORTAL: Even the Superdog Has Fans!

    Read More

    Retro Review: Detective Comics #20 (October 1938)

    Read More

    6 Comments

    1. Dr. Bolty on January 6, 2009 10:34 am

      Ouch, that sucks. Captain Marvel really works when played young, so it’s a shame that he can’t find a niche in the current environment.

      Reply
    2. JMF on January 6, 2009 11:02 am

      Every rumour i’ve heard about this film has made me roll my eyes. Hearing that it canned however has made me shed a lil tear. Mainly because the idea of a Shazam film made me happy, if only that there would have been Black Adam who is one of my favourite villians.

      Reply
    3. Graciela on January 6, 2009 11:48 am

      While I praise the WB for making comic based movies that are edgy and not campy, edginess can’t be sprinkled on all characters in one swoop. It makes sense for a Batman or a Watchmen universe but not all comics are written with such broodiness. It’s too bad because sometimes a funny and well written comic movie can be what the doctor ordered. Not in this comic movie climate, I guess.

      Reply
    4. Lifeisaglitch on January 6, 2009 12:19 pm

      @Graciela

      Too true.

      Reply
    5. doubledumbassonyou on January 6, 2009 12:19 pm

      How’s this a surprise? There are plenty of DCU characters that I want to see on film before Shazam! I think WB is looking at accessibility in their properties, and Billy Batson just doesn’t appear to be just that. But again, I’m pretty much a DCU hater …

      Reply
    6. nu on January 6, 2009 7:27 pm

      nooooooooo. now i’ll never see the rock as black adam

      Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    9.0
    June 13, 2025

    Marvel United: A Pride Special Review

    6.3
    June 10, 2025

    X-Men #17 Review

    6.0
    June 9, 2025

    Power Rangers Prime #7 Review

    6.0
    June 8, 2025

    Retro Review: Detective Comics #20 (October 1938)

    8.0
    June 7, 2025

    Absolute Green Lantern #3 Review

    Patreon Support
    Major Spoilers Store
    Recent Comments
    • Nathan on Wayne’s Comics Podcast #696: Interview with Creators from Concrete Arcanum
    • Austin Cowboy on FIRST LOOK: Conan the Barbarian #21
    • Frank on COMICS PORTAL: Batman Meets… Deadpool!?
    • ZackaryTobias on COMICS PORTAL: Batman Meets… Deadpool!?
    • derrigable on COMICS PORTAL: I Want More than Good Memories!
    Subscribe to the Major Spoilers E-Mail List
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT