01picon.jpg

I have absolutely no information on the release date or pricing of these statues, but I can guarantee you one thing; I will be buying and displaying every single one of these works of art.  These are so much better than those Women of the DCU statues that had half the bodies cut off and embedded in a pillar.

UPDATE:
Pricing $99 each
Wonder Woman – June 2009
Zatanna – August 2009
Catwoman – October 2009

Black Canary – November 2009

More images after the jump.

AH_Canary.jpgAH_WW.jpgAH_WW_side.jpg

AH_Zatanna.jpg

AH_Catwoman.jpgdcadamhughesstatues.jpg

The Author

Stephen Schleicher

Stephen Schleicher

Stephen Schleicher began his career writing for the Digital Media Online community of sites, including Digital Producer and Creative Mac covering all aspects of the digital content creation industry. He then moved on to consumer technology, and began the Coolness Roundup podcast. A writing fool, Stephen has freelanced for Sci-Fi Channel's Technology Blog, and Gizmodo. Still longing for the good ol' days, Stephen launched Major Spoilers in July 2006, because he is a glutton for punishment.

You can follow him on Twitter @MajorSpoilers and tell him your darkest secrets...

Previous post

Marvel Sneak Peek: Deadpool #8

Next post

Review: Captain America #46

22 Comments

  1. duckface
    February 9, 2009 at 6:29 pm — Reply

    No Oracle, Huntress or Batgirl (either of em)? Sadness.

  2. ~wyntermute~
    February 9, 2009 at 6:32 pm — Reply

    Zeeriffic!!!!!!!! Man, I wish I had disposable income.. :( You folks hiring at Stately Spoilers Mansion? (thassa joke. ha. :D )

  3. Modok
    February 9, 2009 at 6:58 pm — Reply

    Those are insane. The only rival these have is the Bishoujo Black Widow and Rogue figures from Kotobukiya. Double drool

  4. Jason
    February 9, 2009 at 7:51 pm — Reply

    em tnaw annataz

  5. brainypirate
    February 9, 2009 at 8:03 pm — Reply

    Good grief — couldn’t they find any female DC heroes who wear pants to make statues of??? And why is Zatanna’s vest about to fall off her chest?

    Sheesh!

  6. Kirby
    February 9, 2009 at 8:29 pm — Reply

    Wish I wasn’t a poor college student.

  7. Esther
    February 9, 2009 at 9:55 pm — Reply

    @brainypirate

    The anime figure magical girl Zatanna’s chest is like that (which looks really weird because in the face she looks like she’s ten). The Wonder Woman one looks older but with a smaller size (surprise there). It’s something about the costume, I guess.

  8. nu
    February 10, 2009 at 2:07 am — Reply

    what no fishnets?

  9. lifeisaglitch
    February 10, 2009 at 6:00 am — Reply

    hubba hubba

  10. brainypirate
    February 10, 2009 at 8:31 am — Reply

    Thanks, Esther. I thought maybe these had been modeled on stripper costumes….

    I ran across the new Dark Avengers mag the other day and there was a shot of Ms. Marvel’s back: the bottom part of her costume was practically a thong! Yikes!

    We really need to get more women artists in the comics, don’t we?

  11. hermit
    February 10, 2009 at 8:34 am — Reply

    i like catwoman. something about the face.

    but i like the others too.

  12. hermit
    February 10, 2009 at 8:38 am — Reply

    hey stephen, i went to dccomics.com and searched for adam hughes. i found 2 of them. 99$ each, released in june

    http://www.dccomics.com/dcdirect/?dcd=11002
    http://www.dccomics.com/dcdirect/?dcd=11391

  13. Phil
    February 10, 2009 at 9:06 am — Reply

    Actually, you do have release date information for them. The last pic has placement cards with the following dates:

    Wonder Woman – June 2009
    Zatanna – August 2009
    Catwoman – October 2009
    Black Canary – November 2009

    I will have to have that Black Canary…

  14. eric
    February 10, 2009 at 10:00 am — Reply

    can u imagine what a power girl statue would look like / soft porn would be the case because everyone in the DC company makes the poor girl look like a candidate for a breast reduction

  15. Esther
    February 10, 2009 at 11:17 am — Reply

    Leotards are always misinterpreted as thongs. The Catwoman one does look really nice though.

  16. Novan Leon
    February 10, 2009 at 11:32 am — Reply

    Sexualized much?

  17. brainypirate
    February 10, 2009 at 2:45 pm — Reply

    I want to see if the statues of the men play up the guys’ packages, butts, nipples, etc. Who do you think is packing more heat: Lantern or Flash? Or the better butt: Supes or Bats — no wait, they both have capes…. Hmmm….

    If you’re going to eroticize the figures, you better do it for both genders…. ;)

  18. The Dude
    February 10, 2009 at 3:00 pm — Reply

    I’m definitely getting the Zatanna and Catwoman statues.

  19. Julian
    February 10, 2009 at 7:23 pm — Reply

    Zatanna and Black Canary for me.

  20. bizbee
    February 10, 2009 at 7:49 pm — Reply

    Wow, it’s amazing how closely they translate the original 2D images to 3D – how do they do that?!

    @brainypirate : I suppose the simple answer as to why they’re all eroticized is in the title: “Adam Hughes Statues” :P

  21. February 15, 2009 at 10:09 pm — Reply

    Do they come inflatable?

You know you have something to say, say it in the comment section