Lionsgate has picked up the distribution rights to the live action adaptation of Will Eisner’s The Spirit movie, written by Frank Miller.

“Will was a dear friend, a mentor, and translating his vision to the screen will be a labor of love,” Miller said.”The Spirit” will be produced by Pritzker and Del Prete, along with Lionsgate’s Mike Paseornek and Batfilm’s Michael Uslan. Benjamin Melniker will exec produce with Steve Maier, and Linda McDonough and F.J. DeSanto are co-producers.


As great as Frank Miller is, this film will be his first solo directing gig. He’s only co-directed one other film – Sin City with Robert Rodriquez, and I’m not sure learning the ropes from the man who breaks all the rules is the best way to learn a craft, but hey, that’s just me.

via Variety

The Author

Stephen Schleicher

Stephen Schleicher

Stephen Schleicher began his career writing for the Digital Media Online community of sites, including Digital Producer and Creative Mac covering all aspects of the digital content creation industry. He then moved on to consumer technology, and began the Coolness Roundup podcast. A writing fool, Stephen has freelanced for Sci-Fi Channel's Technology Blog, and Gizmodo. Still longing for the good ol' days, Stephen launched Major Spoilers in July 2006, because he is a glutton for punishment.

You can follow him on Twitter @MajorSpoilers and tell him your darkest secrets...

Previous post

Dynamite Entertainment Sneak Peek: Painkiller Jane Volume 2 #1

Next post

Top Cow Unveils Prose Line


  1. May 16, 2007 at 10:33 am — Reply

    While I know I shouldn’t judge a creator based on their work and assume they can’t adapt, but Miller’s hard-edged violent dynamism is just about the PRECISE opposite of Will Eisner’s character-based rumpled humanistic Spirit.

    I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t see Miller’s personal vision in any way aligning with Eisner’s. If it turns into “Frank Miller’s Spirit” I’m going to be very dissapointed.

  2. Mark I.
    May 16, 2007 at 11:39 am — Reply

    My thoughts exactly. I know Eisner was an inspiration to Miller, but this has the potential to be pretty bad. Comparing Eisner’s light, masterful story touches to Miller’s gritty, heavy-handed “realism” is like the difference between a surgeon and a butcher. I can appreciate each within the confines of their chosen profession, but the butcher shouldn’t be in the O.R. with an apron and a meat cleaver expecting to be Hawkeye from M.A.S.H.

  3. Stevo
    May 16, 2007 at 1:00 pm — Reply

    According to a couple quotes on Wikipedia, Miller’s interpretation of the Spirit is more “terrifying” (no surprise) and he’s “a bit of a slut.” Not sure that inspires confidence in me.

  4. May 16, 2007 at 3:03 pm — Reply

    Denny Colt is not Batman.

    And even Frank has to realize that not every single character needs to be a grotesque musclebound gargoyle who mysteriously attracts strippers who want to lay him.

    With no idea what the finished product is going to look like, I intend to remain open-minded. That said, I worry that if it goes wrong, it will become the general public’s perception of The Spirit, much like Howard the Duck used to mean a progressive, subversive comic book wise@$$, and now it means a notorious Hollywood flop.

You know you have something to say, say it in the comment section